An open letter to Carole Coleman and RTÉ regarding the Six One News report of July 23rd 2014.
Ms. Coleman,
Over recent weeks I have watched your news reports of the latest Israeli
assault on Gaza with increasing dismay. Your passable report on yesterday’s
Six One News (July 24th) does not erase the effect of relentless
distortions over many more bulletins. As for RTÉ's wider coverage, it continued to
entertain Israeli propaganda in last night’s bulletin, a matter that merits
separate discussion elsewhere. At a time when the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are killing upwards of one
hundred Gazans per day, your reports regularly seek a balance that simply
does not exist in this conflict. In less creditable instances, you
regurgitate Israeli wartime propaganda or let it pass unquestioned. To focus on
just one case in point, I refer specifically to your Six One News report from
two days ago, July 23rd. The report is typical of yours and RTÉ's
coverage over recent weeks in its underlying assumptions, content, and framing.
U.N. Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon provides the deceptive
semblance of balanced reporting. Although clearly not the most important
matter of the day, Ban was, nevertheless, "pressing the matter of
Palestinian casualties", which vaguely reminded us that a place
other than Ben-Gurion Airport might warrant our attention. At the time of
your report, over 600 people, of whom 147 were children and three-quarters
civilians, had died in the IDF bombardment and invasion of Gaza. You
were aware of the figures, having seen the U.N. High Commissioner for
Human Rights quote them that day, but you chose not to worry us with
the details.
We rarely, if ever, glimpse the broken bodies of Israel's victims
on RTÉ, and on July 23rd you kept Palestinian death, the real story on
this day and every day for the past three weeks, far from our eyes.
Instead we saw what an airstrike looks like from a safe distance. You
told us how the war continued "unabated from both sides". More
accurately, it continued at a rate of 150 Palestinian
civilians killed for every civilian killed in Israel. Free from
the nuisance context of Palestinian dead, your report cuts to an
enraged Palestinian woman who, you tell us, is shouting about becoming a suicide
bomber. Thus, in a crude distortion, an effect of Israeli brutality
takes the guise of a cause.
Following this, and for a second time in your report, a
senior U.N. official's statement garners your edifying commentary,
whereas an Israeli representative speaks without qualification. You help us to
understand the restrained message of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human
Rights by distorting it: According to your report, Navi Pillay
"outlined instances where she believed Palestinian civilians had not been
protected by Israel". In fact, just seconds after your explanation, the
High Commissioner, referring to far more pervasive violations than the individual
cases you cite, says the following: "These are just a few instances where
there seems to be a strong possibility that international humanitarian law has
been violated in a manner that could amount to war crimes". A casual
viewer of the RTÉ News might miss the distinction between the High
Commissioner's believing that Israel is not protecting Palestinian civilians (your distortion of her message) and the studied view that Israel may be committing war crimes (her understatement).
Next up in the name of balance is the Israeli Permanent
Representative to the U.N., Eviator Manor, who is given more air time than
any other speaker in your report. You find no reason to qualify his words, unlike
the U.N. Secretary General and High Commissioner for Human Rights. The Israeli
Representative tells us that "there can be no moral symmetry between a
terrorist aggressor and a democracy defending itself". I would suggest, by
way of filling the gap in commentary, that the Representative is correct in his
abstraction, but not for his reasons: Israel and the West torpedoed Palestinian
democracy when Palestinians made the mistake of electing Hamas (the wrong
side) to power in 2006. Over the following eight years Israel has punished this mistake
by increasing terror and devastation across Palestinian civil society, through Western-backed
economic sanctions, increased settlement building in the West Bank, the
brutalising blockade on Gaza, regular airstrikes, and three full-scale
military assaults. RTÉ, via the Permanent Representative, urges us to reflect instead
on moral asymmetries and prefers not to discuss the very real military
asymmetry of the current conflict or to show its consequences. Israeli
historian Avi Shlaim's words during Operation Cast Lead in 2009 remain
depressingly relevant to the present Operation Protective Edge. Summarizing the real-world asymmetry, he noted that when exercising its right of
self-defence from "the pinpricks of rocket attacks", Israel has gone
way beyond the “savage” Biblical principle of "an eye for and
eye". Instead, “Israel's insane offensive against Gaza seems to follow the
logic of an eye for an eyelash."
You round off your report with plans in Ireland to send aid to Gaza's faceless victims and U.S. efforts to end the conflict by
talking to "all sides". Naturally, "all sides" does not
include Hamas, an inadmissible partner in any negotiations, given its
unreasonable demands for an end to the blockade of Gaza – a blockade which has
led to a 72.8% prevalence of anaemia and a 31.4% prevalence of stunting in Gazan
children.
The Six One report of July 23rd is
illustrative because it is unremarkable. The assumption of moral Israeli
intentions forms the basis of all RTÉ reporting on Israel-Palestine and leads
to gross distortions of what is actually happening. One quick thought experiment
illustrates this final point: Let's imagine how a balanced RTÉ report might look in an alternate reality. Leaving aside the horrors of the blockade, let's say that three weeks of Hamas rocket fire has killed 450 Israeli civilians (the estimate of July 23rd in this inverted universe), while three
Palestinian civilians have been killed by Israel in the Gaza strip:
The report opens with the worrying disruption to flights arriving at the normally bustling Yasser Arafat International Airport after a close call from Israeli shelling. Senior Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh gives his opinion on how to get the airport back to full functionality, while a pestering Ban Ki-moon wants to talk about Israeli civilians. A Hamas rocket is shown to hit some kind of building, and a furious Israeli woman raves about retribution. The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights believes that maybe Hamas is not doing enough to protect Israeli civilians, but the Palestinian Representative doesn't want to talk about that, and nor does RTÉ. Instead, he gets to the core of the matter - the moral superiority of the Hamas freedom struggle. We do not hear from any Israeli politician, hawk or dove, or any details on the suffering of civilians in southern Israel. We are told that, in an attempt to broker a ceasefire, Hamas allies Qatar and Turkey have sent envoys who are speaking to all parties (a term which does not include the Israeli Government).
The report opens with the worrying disruption to flights arriving at the normally bustling Yasser Arafat International Airport after a close call from Israeli shelling. Senior Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh gives his opinion on how to get the airport back to full functionality, while a pestering Ban Ki-moon wants to talk about Israeli civilians. A Hamas rocket is shown to hit some kind of building, and a furious Israeli woman raves about retribution. The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights believes that maybe Hamas is not doing enough to protect Israeli civilians, but the Palestinian Representative doesn't want to talk about that, and nor does RTÉ. Instead, he gets to the core of the matter - the moral superiority of the Hamas freedom struggle. We do not hear from any Israeli politician, hawk or dove, or any details on the suffering of civilians in southern Israel. We are told that, in an attempt to broker a ceasefire, Hamas allies Qatar and Turkey have sent envoys who are speaking to all parties (a term which does not include the Israeli Government).
Respectfully yours,
Thomas O’Rourke